manunzio.it logo


Franco Fontana, photographer. He’s dead.


And ninety-two years is a damn good run—a worldly one, for sure. Way back when, Fontana even drifted into these Land (Lucania South Italy) circles; as I recall, hordes of trigger-happy hacks (infuriated pixel-addicts trapped in their own onanistic loop) rushed to bow before the "colorist" Fontana. A man who left his mark across the World and many Galery, as pages of that d'antan monograph published by the then Gruppo Editoriale Fabbri: I Grandi Fotografi" inside it many images of Lucania. As "All Colors of Benetton" or American way of life we could and should remember it. So a disempowered reality, an hyper-colorist image born of fantasies or mink coats—go figure. A fellow Romagnolo, Fontana finds himself his countryman Luigi Ghirri, who has also been underground for quite some time......continue
“The connection and parallel paths during the 1970s of these two Emilians (Ghirri from Scandiano/Reggio Emilia, Fontana from Modena) radically changed the way the Italian landscape and reality were narrated. Franco Fontana established an international reputation thanks to a bold, saturated use of color, reducing the landscape to abstract geometries, flat color blocks, and stark chromatic contrasts. Luigi Ghirri founded a new concept of the Italian landscape based on a conceptual, ironic, and melancholic exploration of everyday life, the provinces, and the signs of representation (maps, postcards, cinema). Despite their stylistic differences—Fontana’s geometric and chromatic abstraction versus Ghirri’s open, conceptual inquiry—their paths frequently crossed. Notable, for instance, was their shared bond with the Emilian cultural scene and even the early support given to Fontana’s work by publishing houses tied to Ghirri. Both remain fundamental points of reference for understanding the evolution of contemporary photography. A reflection on Franco Fontana’s artistic journey and his relationship with Italian landscape photography”—thus rambles the internet, that Great Box. Again Fontana wrote: "My research operation consists of isolating, in space and time, what is normally lost and blended within the infinity of details... the subjects I photograph are merely the pretext... the fascination of the image lies in the violence that created it, a violence necessary to shake off the habits that blind our gaze. We are the carriers and witnesses of the only possible meaning... objectivity is always destined to slip away from us..." — Page 7 of the referenced Fabbri monograph. Ipse dixit, and poorly so, it goes without saying. First off, with this Renaissance-derived egotism—man as the measure of All Things—sure, but with reservations aplenty. And that pleonastic "we" is even worse: pro domo sua rhetoric, straight out of Roman arrogance, Marchese del Grillo style: "...we are us, and you lot aren't shit..." Look at the ravages of Photography for those who chase after the marvels of pixels and increasingly "penetrating" sensors—one has to ask: what kind of backside do you have if the tool is about to pop right out of your mouth? Quarrymen, men who followed boss-men or got two for the price of one... let us speak no more of them and move on to what truly matters to us. So goes the so-called World: you pay the toll like Faust to Mephistopheles. De gustibus.





© archive manunzio


...FR...FFF..FR...FRR...



Advertising MOTOR - società di capitale umano, featuring that anthropomorphic "M" that turns the human being into a graphic gear, a balance-sheet commodity—"capital," indeed.
The almost surgical synchronicity: The real figure walking underneath seems literally to "emerge" from the logo, condemned to walk in the same direction, with a measured stride, inside the perimeter traced by the engineers of communication and productivity.
The visual rendering of human (woman) figure, dark and sharp, becomes the living silhouette of corporate/technological solitude, pressed against a neutral wall beneath a massive sign that defines her before she can even define herself....continue...
Prefabricated blocks. For decades, they old us the myth of the frontier and the city on a hill (america way of life, sure), only to leave us with endless expanses of drywall boxes, highway interchanges, and asphalt sprawls that they have the nerve to call a "town" or a "city." An urban design built not for people to live in, but to keep cars moving and billboard ads in place.
Calling a cluster of four warehouses and a strip of drive-thru lanes a "city" is the absolute triumph of form over substance—where boundless ambition meets the desolation. And when the rhetoric of efficiency and "human capital" tries to dress itself up as global civilization, a single glance from the street is all it takes to lay bare its fragile comedy.


© archive manunzio


Bimbo minchia (the idot)

The true nature of the archive, when stripped of academic sugarcoating, is defined entirely by the duality of those two frames: the testimony of physical presence versus the violence of sanitized erasure.

In the "before" (the silver halide emulsion on the left), the archive is a living stratification. The grain captures the raw texture of the stone, the uneven cobblestones, the communal fountain, and the women bent over their daily labor. This is the physical archive—a material body that absorbed the actual light of that specific moment in time. It holds the wear and tear of existence, the grit of history, and the unfiltered weight of reality. It does not need an algorithm or a theorist to explain itself; the silver on paper retains the fact exactly as it was: hard, rough, and uncompromisingly real....continue

In the "after" (the modern color capture on the right), the archive turns into a sterile makeover. The smooth plaster, the scrubbed facades, and the laid asphalt have wiped away the physical memory of the site, replacing its historical depth with a sanitized, neutral surface. It operates under the exact same logic as an overwritten digital file or a bureaucratic registry: take the unsettling complexity of the past, strip away its friction, and reduce it to a tidy, easily cataloged illusion.

A genuine archive—held on physical paper, sealed in parchment sleeves, and forged through chemistry and time—does not exist to "beautify" history or fit a neat theoretical framework. Its sole duty is to retain the undeniable mark of what occurred.

When real substance is swapped for a superficial coat of paint or a transient pixel, the "after" may look cleaner on paper, but the soul of the space has been evicted. All that remains is an empty shell, primed and ready for the next mindless scroll.

And so the curtain falls on the charade. The Emperor has no clothes, yet it took the unvarnished gaze of the child—the uncorrupted eye that refuses to see fine robes where there is only naked power and bloated dogma—to state the glaring truth.

The entire architecture built by the grand codifiers of Vienna (Sigmund Freud dixit) and their modern corporate heirs rests on a fundamental dread: the fear of raw, unquantifiable life. To take the soul, the Psyche, and drag it down into a mere plumbing system of ducts, retention, and subconscious sewer lines was never an act of liberation. It was an act of aggressive bookkeeping. It turned the mystery of human expression (C. G. Jung), art, and memory into a Ledger of Pathologies.

They replaced the archetype with the diagnosis, the sacred flame with the internal combustion of repressed fluids, and the physical mark of history with an endless, energy-devouring scroll.

The tragedy of the modern consensus—from the Freudians of the early twentieth century to the silicon technocrats of today—is that it cannot abide what it cannot catalog. It hates the stone, the silver halide, the parchment, the ink, and the sheer unpredictability of the artist because all of these demand presence. They demand retention in the true, noble sense: holding fast to reality, bearing witness, and leaving a tangible trace that outlives the temporary noise.

Instead, the world has been handed over to the digital gravediggers, the endless swipers, the consumers of phantom signals who mistake data for memory and a diagnostic label for self-knowledge.

Let the dead bury their dead.

When the servers go cold and the modern spreadsheets collapse under the weight of their own absurdity, what remains will not be the psychoanalytic taxonomies or the algorithms of the Silicon Valley priesthood. It will be what was there at Hammurabi's dawn: the physical mark, the honest contrast, the baked clay, the silver on barite, and the uncompromising voice that refuses to call the Emperor's nakedness a suit of fine silk.




date » 27-08-2026 07:46

permalink » url

tags » dye ink printer canon, pigment canon printer, longevity and papers printed, allah akbar,



Un dos tres...Mambo...un dos tres...Mambo ah ah ah cha cha cha...Mambo
A stream of consciousness, a true satirical-postmodern zibaldone mixing Ventennio slogans (The Italian Fascist Era), pop refrains, Dante (The Fater of Italian Language) quotes ("o voi ch'avete li 'ntelletti sani..."), Petrolini (1884–1936, The Great satirical italian actor of the 1930s who mocked the solemn rhetoric and superficial snobbery of his era through caricatures like Gastone and Nerone), and a sacrosanct technical obsession for the photographic medium....continue...
Scraping away the surreal patina, the underlying bitterness is crystal clear. It is the eternal issue of technique and memory sold by the pound at the marketing counter:

The Trap of Alla cassa alla cassa! (To the cash register, to the cash register!) and "Mandarin Brand" Rhetoric[infoHide=...continue...]
The irritation toward the "bunnies" (or the influencer/content creator of the day) hired by companies like Canon to pontificate on things they barely understand is entirely justified. It is the commodification of a complex technical discipline, reduced to a superficial sales pitch for Generation Z (or "Ypseter") living in the illusion of an eternal digital present.

The Eternal Dilemma: Dye (Water) vs. Pigment

Here lies the technical and poetic core of the rant—the unmentionable truth masked by marketing under the buzzword "longevity":

Water-based ink (Dye): Possesses fluidity and penetration into the paper fiber (especially on the right semi-gloss or baryta surfaces without too many frills) capable of delivering deep blacks, continuous tonal transitions, and an organic brilliance that pigment can never fully replicate. It holds the three-dimensionality of flesh and blood, even if it pays the toll of lower lightfastness and air stability when left unprotected.

Pigment: Solid, mineral, eternal (those "200 or 1000 years" paraded in technical spec sheets). Yet it often sits on top of the substrate. A dry, protective film, "firing blanks" (a salve), which guarantees survival against glitches and fading memories, but sometimes at the expense of the turgidity and softness that only water-based ink provides.

The Digital Illusion vs. The Physical Object

Leaving an image trapped inside a smartphone or cloud storage is a Platonic shadow destined to vanish at the first system breakdown. Printing is an act of resistance, a necessary "blasphemy," even when commercial dynamics push users to buy the latest gadget at the supermarket (nomen omen) instead of grasping the physics of substrates and color.

Lamborghini or Ferrari to Go to the Supermarket?

The Ferrari, without question. If one must perform an act of empty ostentation ("gaja che pria"—a direct Petrolinian deformation from his Nerone sketch), it should be done with a classic red recalling fresh enamel, rather than the sharp, hyper-technological angles of a modern Lamborghini—far too reminiscent of today's molded plastic.

As for that thirty-third trentino who broke out of the chorus like Jack Frusciante... he might be the only one who didn't run "alla cassa" (to the cash register) to be hypnotized by trinkets.

The real question remains: between a dense, fleshy, yet fragile Dye black, and an eternal yet slightly chalky pigment in the shadows, what price are we willing to pay to salvage memory?


(Copy & Past)
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/J2w6Ea3Yog8&t=99s









(Copy & Past)


https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/D4xQhGiM2bQ





© archive manunzio


Una pera o la pera? This is question...

Ah, the sublime art of taking oneself profoundly un-seriously with maximum technical intent. Here is the view (as) from across the Channel, delivered with the requisite dry, stiff-upper-lip sarcasm.
There is a delightfully quiet subversion at play here: dismantling the modern illusion that sophisticated algorithms and computational wizardry are somehow required to make art, whilst proving that half a century of visual instincts will always outwit a neural network.
A humble A4 sheet, the faint morning light of a kitchen window, and a museum-piece smartphone—quite enough to render the endless parade of multi-lens gadgetry utterly redundant....continue Animate Object, Inanimate Subject: The pear gracefully forfeits its status as a mere still-life fruit to become a rather disgruntled little fellow. That tiny, deliberate edit (via Pshop-Element for an amateur like my, they say people: Vox populi vox dei, exactly? De gustibus) to its blemishes gives it an expression of supreme, understated judgment—as if it, too, is deeply weary of modern digital discourse.
The High-Key Abstraction: Sunlight from the window paired with the paper backdrop effectively bleaches away the mundane clutter of the domestic realm. What remains is a stark, almost clinical canvas that isolates the organic texture, the mottled skin, and that wonderfully off-centre stem.
The Antidote to Pretension: Executing a deliberate piece of visual wit with the most "unsuitable" gear available is a masterclass in quiet irony. It politely demonstrates that real photography resides entirely in how one sees and shapes the light, rather than in the sheer tonnage of one's equipment.
A splendidly sardonic exercise...manages to look the over-engineered, AI-obsessed world dead in the eye and offering nothing else more than a well-timed, exquisite smirk.







date » 20-08-2026 11:24

permalink » url

tags » tomato pomodoro, new york tomato, rite and form, esperidi hercules, allah akbar,


© archive manunzio


The Rite and the Form...


An anthropometric and material portrait a narrative of the August "Red Rite" pomodoro/tomato captures the visual, olfactory, and social memory of domestic preservation in the Mezzogiorno.

A moment please: because is more important the etymology and semantics are important: The overlap between cultivation (coltivare) and culture (cultura tout court) finds its practical consecration here. The shift from working the land to defining time and family roles is direct proof of this shared root and "litterary" of books an not only this.
Again, In fact the Myth and geohistorical transit: The ironic re-reading of Hercules' labours and the "golden tomato" of the Hesperides exposes the paradox of academic narratives, drawing a straight line from classical myth to today's socio-economic dynamics of the harvest....continue...
Pomodor/tomato or the Red Sea an other example of Rite: Tomato wedges left to dry in the sun on heavy wooden boards, where flies end up drowned in that dense crimson sea like the Pharaohs of the Biblical text. And for precaution the womens put a mesh netting pulled over them isn't just hygiene—it is a frontline shield for the harvest and Codex alimentarius.
The ritual of preserving: The architecture for season winter prep—from tied strings ('nzerte) of sun-dried peppers to ciraselle (which the barbarians misname "hot chili"), from peaches in syrup to clay jars packed with eggplants, garlic, oil, small onions, and lampascioni sealed tight with waxed paper and twine. It wasn't simple subsistence; it was a biological conquest of the cold season hic et nunc.
During the Rite of pomodoro/tomato and other, was a Taboo and control: The commanding authority of the women and the strict requirement of being in a state of "grace" (excluding anyone on her monthly cycle to prevent spoilage bottle of salsa/suice) stands as one of the most ancient, rigorous biological codes of Mediterranean society.

A bit of personal memory: a my aunty, from around my town to New York strain make same Rite He did the same ritual.: A ritual so powerful it crossed the Atlantic. An yet In the old-style New York of yesterday, a tall, imposing aunt would run the exact same pomodoro operation (as Grandfater of Francis Ford Coppola that make the wine) on her own turf, leaving the local Yankees—especially the women—staring in absolute, wide-eyed bewilderment at this blood-red domestic machinery that no "sauce" label could ever define.










Anno Domini 1839


August 1839 in Paris, the umbilicus mundi. Napoleon and his Grandeur—the underlying substrate of transalpine cousins descending from Caesar’s Gauls, though their tribal formats trace back to the dark forests of Germanic cavemen—have long been buried with a dose of poison. The air is electric in the not-yet Ville Lumière. A static buzz of whispers passes mouth to mouth among the common folk. Meanwhile, the powdered wigs—laden with lice, because washing is deemed a sign of popular decay, far removed from the public latrines, free fountains, and Roman thermae of every social stratum—see Deputies, "scientists" of every mandatory capitalized Order, and a horde of court hangers-on paid off by the "daubers" gather. Those Messieurs of the Academy of Fine Arts, no less....continue...

In a teeming Paris, the invention of Monsieur Jacques Mandé Daguerre is handed to the world Urbi et Orbi. His mentor is François Arago (accent on the final o), the Grand Master of the Grand Orient of France and a "radical" Deputy. A staged performance to give you chills, thrown together haphazardly. True, the political machinery began rolling in Parliament back in January of that same year, but the heavy marketing deployment hits around mid-August, right when the Masonic Sun sits at its true or false zenith.

Hugs, kisses, pats on the back, and Arago is completely unstoppable. A picturesque scene, precisely how the sacred texts of the "magnificent and progressive destinies" of Capital swallowed it whole.

Across the white cliffs of Dover (England) stands a pompous, short-tempered landowner, immortalized by history as a filthy lord barely holding back his rage: Lord Fox Talbot. A clever fox, yet he has every right to be furious: by Jove, these French people are inspicable! I am the pure truth, I am the inventor of Photography! Negative to positive, the famous window fixed on wax-treated paper, placed in contact with another, et voilà. "Stop the game," says Talbot.

Yet there is a third party, far away between the Pampas and the Amazon: another Frenchman forgotten by mainstream history and Masonic lodges alike.

The accepted story no longer holds up, which is why the trumpets are sounding—not yet of the Apocalypse, but perhaps pointing to the real inventor.

The image (tiny image) where Niépce and Daguerre formalize their business partnership, a square and compass sit right on the edge. Intelligenti pauca.of the "generous" Daguerre and his partnership with Nicéphore Niépce—whom hagiography credits with recording the rooflines of Le Gras after an eight-hour exposure—presents a specific narrative. Yet earlier still life shots of plaster casts suggest a history shaped by well-fed, directed historians. The birth of photography has many fathers not fully brought to light, while Freemasonry has pulled strings since Babel, institutionalized in London 1717 at the Goose Tree Tavern.

The Forgotten Pioneer of São Carlos to Brazil

While Paris celebrated and Talbot protested to the Royal Society, Hercules Florence—a Frenchman living in Vila de São Carlos (now Campinas, Brazil)—was working in total isolation as early as 1832–1833.

The Terminology: Florence used the word Photographie in his manuscript diaries in 1833, six years before John Herschel and Daguerre popularized the term in Europe.

The Method: Lacking European materials, Florence developed a contact printing process using silver nitrate-sensitized paper, fixed first with urine (for ammonia) and later ammonium hydroxide. He used a negative/positive system to reproduce pharmaceutical labels, diplomas, and his Zoophonie illustrations documenting animal calls.

The Rediscovery: His work remained buried in his notebooks until Brazilian photographer and historian Boris Kossoy uncovered and authenticated his precedence and scientific autonomy through laboratory analysis in the 1970s.

The Map of Fathers and Shadows


Official history imposed a narrative of simultaneous discovery between France and England. Looking past 19th-century institutional marketing reveals a broader set of key figures:

Nicéphore Niépce (left, sitdow in drawn image with Daguerre, up): Produced the 1826/27 heliograph on pewter coated with Bitumen of Judea, establishing the technical foundation Daguerre later commercialized.

Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre (left image cover) was the inventor of daguerrotype more different to Photography

Hercule Florence (center image cover) Independently produced stable photographic images on paper years before the Paris announcement.

William Henry Fox Talbot (right image cover) Invented the negative/positive paper process that formed the methodological foundation for analog photography.

Hippolyte Bayard: Developed a direct positive paper process prior to August 1839. Persuaded by Arago to delay his announcement to clear the way for the Daguerreotype, Bayard staged his Self-Portrait as a Drowned Man in protest—one of the earliest conceptual photographic works.

The end of Tragedy named Photography (at this days noticied as Fotto-grafia, or exactly Fuck-graphy" right up the ass, through the Kapital's marketing propaganda)? I don't no. And Hippolyte Bayard..?

Ps. On table (image) below hand of Daguerre a "square & compass" like sign of Freemassonery

(Copy & Paste)
https://boriskossoy.com.br/textos-selecionados/
https://boriskossoy.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/hercule_florence_image.pdf











No word



Be Open to Chance Rodney’s first (and last) shoot for Ralph Lauren. This picture was shot totally spontaneously. The experience taught me several important lessons. We had just completed a shoot for Ralph Lauren and we were driving back to New York City. On our way, the art director realized that we had yet to shoot a picture of a certain outfit. We stopped the car immediately to solve the problem. Directly outside the car was this field....continue...
The art director said we needed to shoot a picture without showing the model’s face. At first, I suggested we shoot from behind. For some reason, this was not acceptable. We had a canoe for the shoot that we had never used. Suddenly, I came up with the idea to place the canoe on top of the model’s head. This sudden thought was a combination of spontaneity, luck, and necessity. However, unbeknownst to me at the time, there was probably also something deeper at play.

For years I had placed hats on the heads of my subjects. By doing so, I obscured their heads and faces, and these pictures inadvertently became more and more surreal. This was not because I consciously or intellectually decided that’s what I wanted; rather, it was because I liked playing with the iconic image of the hat. On the one hand, it dressed people up, finished the outfit, and made them timeless. But on the other hand, it acted as this obscuring object that made the person every man, as opposed to a specific person in time and history. So, without even realizing it, I used the canoe as if it were a giant hat.

I usually spend days scouting and finding the perfect location. However, here we were obviously pressed for time, and we had to get this shot right away. We literally took the canoe off the car, and placed it in the field right where we stopped. This was a very important lesson to me. While the location is so important in my pictures and I work so hard to find the perfect place, on occasion, I can take what is given to me and make a great picture. This particular picture was totally fortuitous. We did not scout or permit the field; it was just kind of handed to me. And to this day I really like this picture.

Sometimes, days of preparation will not necessarily result in a perfect picture. I have learned over the years to try to use things to my advantage. I scout when it’s sunny, but it rains on the shoot. The model is happy at the casting, and depressed on the shoot day. The right clothes don’t arrive, etc. If you want to shoot on location, be open to the possibility of luck and chance. If this ability to not be in complete control is too bothersome, I suggest you stick to inanimate objects, landscapes, or accounting. Be open to complications and problems. I welcome the rainy day, because I never know what may grow from it.

In the end, I was told Ralph Lauren never used this picture because he claimed it was too strong for the clothes. People remembered the image over the clothing. I don’t know if that story is true, but it perhaps shows insight on the part of Ralph Lauren.








© archive manunzio




Vir' o mar' quant'è bello spira tanto sentimentooo
If we are going to lay down the truth let's give it the full narrative weight, the proper bite of satire, and the sweeping tribute that both the method and that immortal piece of Japanese hardware actually deserve it.
They say the camera makes the photograph. Right?...and
who am I to argue with such profound, enlightened wisdom (well mercenary payied)?
It was clearly not the human behind the viewfinder who recognized the sheer visual comedy of a street sign reading Via Cristoforo Colombo planted dead-center on the horizon line, jutting straight out of the pebbled shoreline into the vast blue expanse. It was certainly not a photographer who had the audacity, the patience, and the old-school discipline to plant their feet on that exact stretch of promenade, transform a trivial piece of coastal infrastructure into a theatrical stage, and wait. No, no. We must render unto Caesar—or rather, unto Olympus—what belongs to the machinery....continue...
It was obviously the legendary Olympus C-5060 Wide Zoom that possessed the divine intelligence to stand its ground while the world drifted by in blissful ignorance. That gloriously built, brick-like masterpiece of early-2000s digital engineering apparently orchestrated the entire scene. Its 1/1.8-inch CCD sensor must have reached out, grabbed the mid-day sun, and decided all on its own to carve those razor-sharp, dense Mediterranean blues that modern CMOS sensors still try to imitate with complex post-processing algorithms.
The snappy 27-110mm equivalent lens didn't just render the scene with pristine optical clarity; it must have secretly whispered to the passersby, directing their stride, timing their footprints, and aligning their silhouette perfectly with the vertical axis of the post at the exact microsecond required to land the punchline.
Because that is how it works, isn't it? You simply buy a vintage digital tank, step outside, and the universe instantly aligns itself into a sharp, witty commentary on human orientation and historical ironies. The camera does it all. You just sit back and take the credit.
To the sceptics, the barbarians, and the believers in pure digital luck: you are entirely right. The machine did every single bit of the heavy lifting. The photographer was merely an accessory, holding the strap, waiting patiently on a warm afternoon while the equipment authored another small, perfect piece of street documentary.
Prosit to the machine, and to those (like me) who actually know better. Sure.







search
pages
i
ITA - Informativa sui cookies • Questo sito internet utilizza la tecnologia dei cookies. Cliccando su 'Personalizza/Customize' accedi alla personalizzazione e alla informativa completa sul nostro utilizzo dei cookies. Cliccando su 'Rifiuta/Reject' acconsenti al solo utilizzo dei cookies tecnici. Cliccando su 'Accetta/Accept' acconsenti all'utilizzo dei cookies sia tecnici che di profilazione (se presenti).

ENG - Cookies policy • This website uses cookies technology. By clicking on 'Personalizza/Customize' you access the personalization and complete information on our use of cookies. By clicking on 'Rifiuta/Reject' you only consent to the use of technical cookies. By clicking on 'Accetta/Accept' you consent to the use of both technical cookies and profiling (if any).

Accetta
Accept
Rifiuta
Reject
Personalizza
Customize
Link
https://www.manunzio.it/diary-d
copy copied!

Share
/ / email


Counter
583.807

Terms
cookie, privacy and copyright

Powered
myphotoportal.com

Chiudi
Close
loading