manunzio.it logo

date » 29-08-2026 10:24

permalink » url

tags » sigmund freud sionist hebrew, positivisme science, psyché is not traslable as soul, modern teocracy at base bit, modern era, before and after restored bulding photogray, allah akbar, carl gustav jung soul,


© archive manunzio


Bimbo minchia (the idot)

The true nature of the archive, when stripped of academic sugarcoating, is defined entirely by the duality of those two frames: the testimony of physical presence versus the violence of sanitized erasure.

In the "before" (the silver halide emulsion on the left), the archive is a living stratification. The grain captures the raw texture of the stone, the uneven cobblestones, the communal fountain, and the women bent over their daily labor. This is the physical archive—a material body that absorbed the actual light of that specific moment in time. It holds the wear and tear of existence, the grit of history, and the unfiltered weight of reality. It does not need an algorithm or a theorist to explain itself; the silver on paper retains the fact exactly as it was: hard, rough, and uncompromisingly real....continue

In the "after" (the modern color capture on the right), the archive turns into a sterile makeover. The smooth plaster, the scrubbed facades, and the laid asphalt have wiped away the physical memory of the site, replacing its historical depth with a sanitized, neutral surface. It operates under the exact same logic as an overwritten digital file or a bureaucratic registry: take the unsettling complexity of the past, strip away its friction, and reduce it to a tidy, easily cataloged illusion.

A genuine archive—held on physical paper, sealed in parchment sleeves, and forged through chemistry and time—does not exist to "beautify" history or fit a neat theoretical framework. Its sole duty is to retain the undeniable mark of what occurred.

When real substance is swapped for a superficial coat of paint or a transient pixel, the "after" may look cleaner on paper, but the soul of the space has been evicted. All that remains is an empty shell, primed and ready for the next mindless scroll.

And so the curtain falls on the charade. The Emperor has no clothes, yet it took the unvarnished gaze of the child—the uncorrupted eye that refuses to see fine robes where there is only naked power and bloated dogma—to state the glaring truth.

The entire architecture built by the grand codifiers of Vienna (Sigmund Freud dixit) and their modern corporate heirs rests on a fundamental dread: the fear of raw, unquantifiable life. To take the soul, the Psyche, and drag it down into a mere plumbing system of ducts, retention, and subconscious sewer lines was never an act of liberation. It was an act of aggressive bookkeeping. It turned the mystery of human expression (C. G. Jung), art, and memory into a Ledger of Pathologies.

They replaced the archetype with the diagnosis, the sacred flame with the internal combustion of repressed fluids, and the physical mark of history with an endless, energy-devouring scroll.

The tragedy of the modern consensus—from the Freudians of the early twentieth century to the silicon technocrats of today—is that it cannot abide what it cannot catalog. It hates the stone, the silver halide, the parchment, the ink, and the sheer unpredictability of the artist because all of these demand presence. They demand retention in the true, noble sense: holding fast to reality, bearing witness, and leaving a tangible trace that outlives the temporary noise.

Instead, the world has been handed over to the digital gravediggers, the endless swipers, the consumers of phantom signals who mistake data for memory and a diagnostic label for self-knowledge.

Let the dead bury their dead.

When the servers go cold and the modern spreadsheets collapse under the weight of their own absurdity, what remains will not be the psychoanalytic taxonomies or the algorithms of the Silicon Valley priesthood. It will be what was there at Hammurabi's dawn: the physical mark, the honest contrast, the baked clay, the silver on barite, and the uncompromising voice that refuses to call the Emperor's nakedness a suit of fine silk.


date » 01-06-2026 18:48

permalink » url

tags » history of photography, divers" (subacquei) George Hoyningen-Huene 1930, plein air photography, daylight, street photography, allah akbar, xx century of photografpy, thumberwald,

"Divers"(Subacquei) shoot of photographer George Hoyningen-Huene in year 1930.
_____________________________
"The history of photography could be read as the history of the struggle between two different imperatives: the one to beautify, which comes from the fine arts, and the one to tell the truth, which comes from the sciences. While initial thought held that the photographer was an acute but impartial observer, with the discovery that objectivity was merely a mystification (no one photographs the same object in the exact same way), the hypothesis that photographic images provided an impersonal representation had to give way to the fact that photographs do not just attest to what is there, but also to what the photographer sees through their interpretation, which is never just a document, but above all a personal evaluation of the surrounding world." continue...
This core paradox defines photography from its very origins. This constant tension between the "beautiful" and the "true," between the precision of the scientific document and the choice of artistic expression, is what makes the photographic medium so layered and beautifully unstable.

At the beginning, photography was welcomed as the ultimate objective tool of the modern era—an image not impressed by a human hand, but by light itself through chemistry and optics. This presumed objective virginity was useful for science, archeology, and the cataloging of the world. It seemed to say: "The medium is impersonal, therefore reality is here, naked and incontestable."

But reality never offers itself unfiltered. It requires someone to decide where the frame ends, which fragment to isolate from the surrounding chaos, and above all, how to direct and shape the light. The moment a photographer chooses a lens, cuts out the rest of the world, or decides to expose for the shadows while sacrificing the highlights, objectivity dissolves. It becomes a personal evaluation.

What was initially considered a limitation or a "betrayal" of the documentary purpose—the interpretive intervention of the photographer—has proven to be its greatest strength. Photography does not mirror the world; it translates it. Every single choice, from the density of a black to a warm tone or the selection of a specific surface, is a precise semantic decision that shifts the balance from pure fact to the intimate testimony of a gaze.

In this sense, every shot ends up being a double portrait: it photographs what is in front of the lens, but it reveals in the background the mind, the background, and the intention of the person behind it.


search
i ⛶
ITA - Informativa sui cookies • Questo sito internet utilizza la tecnologia dei cookies. Cliccando su 'Personalizza/Customize' accedi alla personalizzazione e alla informativa completa sul nostro utilizzo dei cookies. Cliccando su 'Rifiuta/Reject' acconsenti al solo utilizzo dei cookies tecnici. Cliccando su 'Accetta/Accept' acconsenti all'utilizzo dei cookies sia tecnici che di profilazione (se presenti).

ENG - Cookies policy • This website uses cookies technology. By clicking on 'Personalizza/Customize' you access the personalization and complete information on our use of cookies. By clicking on 'Rifiuta/Reject' you only consent to the use of technical cookies. By clicking on 'Accetta/Accept' you consent to the use of both technical cookies and profiling (if any).

Accetta
Accept Rifiuta
Reject Personalizza
Customize
Link
https://www.manunzio.it/diary-d
copy copied!

Share
/ / email

Counter
581.783

Terms
cookie, privacy and copyright

Powered
myphotoportal.com

Chiudi
Close
loading