manunzio.it logo







(Copy & Past)
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/wapY5CFsKUA



Ps. For people not speaks italian see an choise menu for other language





Big Print statio (part one)

Now, this is going to be a long one, so we are splitting it into two or maybe three episodes for those who have the stomach for it. And let’s be clear: "iPhone-scrollers" or compulsive Android-swipers are definitely not welcome here. Go find some other arena to release your squalid digital discharges. Likewise, the minchiapixel (coin for "pixel-peepers")—too busy measuring the size of their digital junk under a virtual microscope—can take a hike. Both of people, please go play somewhere else...continue

This premise is both necessary and sufficient, because here on Manunzio.it, somewhere between the serious and the facetious, we actually understand and talk about photography. We’ve been doing it for fifteen years on the Manunzio.it, backed by a solid sixty years (see the About section) of pure Analogue experience. It is an epic saga that we are unrolling here—literally—just like the procedure that perfectly matches the cover image.
For anyone who has ever set foot in a darkroom—where you work with actual Alchemy, guiding the print from nigredo (the pitch-black void of the undeveloped negative), through albedo (the magical whitening where the image emerges in the tray), to the final rubedo (the completed, immortal piece)—what the printer-man narrates isn't just a tall tale. It is the absolute, unadulterated truth, and we back it up one hundred percent, no ifs, ands, or buts.
And if I still had the space in this "hovel" that goes by the grand name of an apartment (ha ha ha), we would still know exactly how to develop and print a 50x60 sheet. Yes, for the English-speakers out there, that translates to roughly 19.69 x 23.62 inches—a beast that offers about 20% more surface area than a standard modern A2 sheet.

To "pull" a print that size, when I was a "garzone" of photo-laboratory namde Foto-Lampojust in POtenza my town where living two massive trays were enough: the developer bath and the fixer.

Or rather, once the printing-developing-fixing dance was done, you would swap the trays out (on the temperature-controlled bench) sliding them from right to left (the exact opposite for the development-fix routine) like moving heavy gears in a clockwork press. This secondary fixing bath was the secret key to total archival stability. This meticulous choreography was standard practice for prints crafted as fine art by wise, experienced hands.

Again say, the classic 30x40 cm (12 x 16 inches) or A3/A3 Plus prints, which simply ended up in standard 40x50 cm exhibition frames for "very nice people".
Just remembering the 1970s..Then, those giant "bedsheets" of paper, alongside the smaller 18x24 cm (7 x 9.5 inches) companion prints showcasing local theater plays or notary parades led by Colombo—the local and Prime Minister Christian Democrat boss—would all end up pinned inside the public display case right outside the Via Pretoria (yes same name of castrum romans)on Main Street...
But that’s all for now. For those who want more, the link is right below...

Link...https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/qfrJh30iHOE




----- "A fessa ’mman’ e criatur’" Project Polaroid 20x24 -----(Placing a precious and serious instrument in the hands of someone who lacks the maturity or skill to master it: A fessa 'mman' e criatur'.

[font2]This dynamic could easily be described by the evangelical idiom "casting pearls before swine." Either way, what is on display here is "phuck-tography"—not a typo, but a deliberate play on words. In this context, it refers to the art of trickery or deception, far removed from the genuine craft of the past.
continue...
There is a stark contrast between the current smartphone-obsessed generation—individuals walking blindly down the street, eyes glued to screens—and the history of high-end photographic tools. The legendary Polaroid 20x24-inch format, a behemoth introduced about half a century ago, was originally engineered for monumental tasks of absolute precision, such as documenting the restoration of the Sistine Chapel. When that era ended, this massive instant camera trickled down to studios, often used for large-format portraits of celebrities and cultural icons.

Historically, the workflow was dictated by utility and resourcefulness, not vanity:

Identification Photos: In the 1970s and earlier, nobody wasted massive Polaroid sheets for routine portraits. Instead, studios relied on a pivoting stand camera shooting on 6×9 film—essentially a "one-sixteenth" equivalent of the Polaroid giant—which apprentices would develop in local darkrooms.

Press Photography: For actual news and street journalism, the true workhorses of the era were the Rolleiflex or the rugged, rangefinder-style Fujifilm BL 6×9. These robust tools fed the daily press, with images traveling rapidly from regional agencies to major national newspapers.

Today, while digital capture and inkjet printing dominate the landscape, the revival of these analog behemoths often serves a different purpose. It frequently caters to an era of boundless narcissism, where eccentric equipment is paraded on platforms like YouTube to transform the mundane into self-proclaimed "Art." While everyone is free to pursue their own tastes, this trend often mistakes the extravagance of the medium for the depth of the content, obscuring the discipline, sweat, and darkroom mastery that defined classic photography.

Link (Copy & Paste)
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/FNxHLVFjVdA








© archive manunzio

Ciunnella (as My Africa)
As No any regular clock, this afternoon of whispers and blindin' reflections is sparklin' all along the walls of the Società elettrica lucana— at this time Enterprise called Enel today a big energy. The sun is playin' hide-and-seek with the shadows of the Montereale pine forest up above, a holy kind of woods wrappin' up the trashman’s shack, white like lime, lookin' like some cheap Western movie western set.
Right at the edge of the cliff underneath, wide open there’s that evil, cracked-up ugly big building. On the right side, between the retaining walls and the slopes, rivers of open sewage are top-spillin' straight down toward the garage-workshop of the Calabro-lucana railway.
Behind those walls, a fuckin' beehive is boilin' with raw humanity, leanin' out of balconies with rusty-ass iron railings. Bare-chested kids walkin' barefoot, slops, manure, donkeys brayin', big spitters on the floor, mothers screamin' fit to die, and broken straw chairs with clothes hangin' to dry in the sun. Sows, rabbits, chickens, all mixed up together, no stop, no distance.
Far away, in a dog day of summer stay the taxidriver (of Piazza Prefettura—Piazza Matteotti,) elbows on the railing, is the starin' staring into space And he mutters to himself ca s' la 'ntend'—that the guy is screwin' around with a mother o. And he takes a quiet drag from his Nazionale cigarette while slickin' back his greasy hair, his eyes lingerin' on the common wood box (Wc): a shitter with three planks around it just for a joke of privacy, two holes in the ground, and the whole fuckin' countryside open right on the horizon line.

You see? No Hollywood stars here. This is raw, sun-burnt land . Shadows so black they stain your fingers, and light so sharp it cuts like a razor. Go home Yankee!







© archive manunzio

====== On the Street ======
In the image (a calembour where U stands apart from the X, translating as "You for such/someone", leading into "are 3D"—literally "You/you all are 3D"), I am not merely documenting an urban find. I am performing a surgical intervention, the frame as a space where memory and surface must align. My approach is rooted in the Analogic Era but refined through digital precision.
I looked at the original sky—with its two generic, coincidental clouds—and found them inauthentic to the weight of the silhouette.
The Intervention:
The Rejection of Chance: I removed the original clouds (side rifht) because they were a distraction that weakened the tension of the billboard.
The Archival Graft: I replaced them with a specific cloud from my personal archive, bridging decades of technical experience. It is the insertion of a known truth into a found decay.
Surface and Balance: My choice was dictated by a deep familiarity with textures, such as the Ferrania Vega surfaces I have handled throughout my career. The grain of this specific cloud acts as a formal counterweight to the "crack" in the shadow's head.
The result is a synthesis. To the left, the U X TALE ARE 3D fragment represents the physical, wounded reality of the billboard. To the right, the sky is no longer a random occurrence; it is my sky, a curated space that transforms the "dolor" of the shadow into a purposeful authorial statement.








© archive manunzio


I---- llusion living ------
The Great Amnesia: Architecture in the Age of the "Green Toupee" and the "E-scape" When the human eye scans the modern skyline, it no longer finds a dialogue with the soul, but a cold monologue of "1s and 0s." We are witnessing a Great Amnesia of the Detail, where the "ictus"—that rare flash of architectural genius—is treated like a glitch in a system designed by humanoids who have lost all contact with the material world.

1 The Dictatorship of the Binary Code
Modern construction isn't "built"; it is "rendered." We have moved from the Analogic Era—where light was a tool to carve shadows into stone—to a digital e-scape. In this electronic landscape, the building is no longer a body to be dressed, but a product to be optimized.
The Cost of Beauty: A molding between floors or a hand-crafted window frame is a "variable" that the spreadsheet cannot justify.
The Plastic Void: We use PVC and pre-assembled kits because they are cheap, but they are silent. They don't resonate; they don't have "grain." They represent an architecture of avoidance: avoiding maintenance, avoiding risk, and ultimately, avoiding humanity.
continue...
2 The "Green Toupee" (The Cosmetic Mask)
To hide this aesthetic bankruptcy, the humanoid builder resorts to the ultimate trick: the green toupee. In the fashionable districts (for example) of the "Milan to drink" era, we see buildings wrapped in climbing ivy. But this isn't a return to nature; it is a botanical wig slapped onto a bald, characterless "capannone."
The Illusion of Life: It is a "greenwashing" tactic used to camouflage the lack of chiaroscuro. Since the building has no "muscles" (no depth, no texture) to show off in the sun, it hides behind a parrucchino of leaves.
The "Fogna" (The Sewer): Underneath that thin layer of green, the structure remains a "sewer" of aesthetic indifference, a structure that doesn't know how to age because it was never truly alive.

3 Living in the E-scape
You don’t need to be an architect or a historian to feel this "e-scape"—this escape from reality. It is a transition from Place (which has a scent, a texture, and a history) to Space (a mere mathematical coordinate).
The Fear of Light: Real architecture—the kind with moldings and stone—loves the sun. Modern architecture is terrified of "inopportune" light because it reveals the ripples in the cheap cladding and the soul-crushing flatness of the design.
The Inhabitable Rendering: We are living inside 3D-printed financial assets. The "humanoid" builder doesn't care if a window opens with a satisfying click or if a ledge catches the sunset; they only care if the digital model looks "iconic" enough to sell.
Conclusion: The Analogic Exile

For those who still remember the weight of the material world, this "e-scape" is a desert. We have traded the nourishing bread of craftsmanship for a plastic wafer. We are surrounded by a "shrink-wrap" aesthetic—a film that keeps the rain out but has no pores, no wrinkles, and no soul.
The "ictus" we see every now and then is the last desperate cry of the human in a world of silicon, a reminder that a building should be a skin that breathes, not a parrucchino that hides the void.

Ps. A below link that I think more instructive, please note is italian but you can select other language as English

(Copy past and ignore alert)
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/UITmO4AGH6Y




© archive manunzio


The strength of those hands, etched with deep furrows and engaged in the ritual of cunserv' (tomato in bottle for winter seanson when in old time never tomato is possible to made any recipe), tells a story that crosses and connects generations.

This image captures a moment of the domestic tomato ritual from a place here in Lucania in southern Italy, where a "cunserv' p' l'invern'" (stock tomato for winter) was both a necessity and an art (again, for example, a tall and shapely aunt tried to do in New York in the Sixties) like (other memory) the wine made by Agostino Coppola from Bernalda, in the province of Matera—who, in the 1920s, produced wine in the basement of his New York apartment building—this quintessentially female ritual represents an identity that Generation Z is entirely unaware of.

The Rendering of the Film: The chromatic density of the EPR 64 slide emerges with that deep blue that only the chemistry of the last century could deliver, preserved here by the reproduction made with my faithful iPhone "sketchbook".

The 135mm lens Zeiss, used in this shoot, on the Contax RTS isolated the moment with surgical precision, transforming domestic labor into a Mandala of pure concentration, free from distractions.
The Invisible Retouch: The intervention of the "trained silicon" acted like my uncle's that via pencil, on the inclined table, retouched the negative for studio-portrait as Hollywood scene essence, eliminating those intruders that were impossible to remove on location at the time of the shoot in the 1970s.
Professional Technique: Despite the use of Photoshop Elements, the structure of the image maintains that analog dignity belonging to my professional history with Ferrania and its specific surfaces.







© archive manunzio


The Inversion of Reality: What is "above" is a blurred, mechanical non-entity—the "blindness" of a ghost of motion. What is "below," in the puddle, is the only thing with structure. The reflection isn't a copy; it’s the truth of the encounter.
The tension isn't between bodies, but between shadows. The man's silhouette is leaning into the Signora (Morte). It’s an inevitable attraction, a magnetic pull toward the dark shape that waits in the water.
We are in the gutter, yet the light is divine. The high-contrast black of the coats emerging from the reflected sky is pure chiaroscuro. It's an archeological dig on a horizontal plane: I didn't dig into the earth, I waited for the sky to fall into a hole in the asphalt to see the "unaligned."
Morte Supra Nos we walk over our own end every day, distracted by the pace of the "analogic era" vs the "digital shoot." I caught the exact millisecond where the physical step (Life/Motion) is superseded by the reflected destiny (The Signora/The End).





© archive manunzio


When we say "vegetal" instead of "digital," we are mocking the modern obsession with pixels and sensors as if they were something "natural" or "living" that grows on its own.

In fact: The "Vegetal" vs. Silicon is an Glossary for the Uninitiated. To the "barbarian" English speaker, the term "vegetal" might seem like a mistake. It is not. It is a sharp, ironic jab at the Digital Era.

The process "vegetal" because, since the year 2000, pixels have started to "grow" and multiply across our screens like weeds in an untended garden. It’s a sarcastic way of saying that digital imagery—often praised for its "organic" or "life-like" quality—is actually a chaotic, synthetic overgrowth that needs a human hand to prune it.

The Pruning, just as a gardener cuts back a hedge, a photographer from the Analogic Era (since 1969) knows how to "cut". I Don't just let the digital sensor "grow" whatever it wants; they force the "vegetal" pixels into a specific, dramatic shape.

The Irony of Calling it "vegetal" mocks the idea that the machine tout court is "smart" or "natural." But I reminds the reader that without the human "trick"—the eye that knows how to handle a lens—the digital result is just a mess of silicon-based "foliage."

date » 18-02-2026 10:40

permalink » url

tags » urban poster, street affiche, urban life, daylight, olympus C 5060 wz, photo calembour,



"Soldier's Sword"
This shot is a classic piece of Analogic Era grit, now blown up and plastered as a street poster (affiche) for the whole city to see. The shadows don't just exist; they perform. The lace creates a literal "battlefield" of geometry against the soft, organic fur, but the real punchline is in the caption staring everyone in the face.

"Col Filo di Milite" isn't just about a military edge; it’s a direct, anatomical wink to the "Soldier's Blade" (his sword, his piece, his... well, you get it). It’s a classic calembour that cuts through the sterile, polite BS of modern digital imagery.

The human eye catches the "stiff" irony of a soldier standing at attention right in the middle of the sidewalk. It’s a middle finger to the "inopportune light" and a celebration of the raw, irreverent calembour.







search
pages
i
ITA - Informativa sui cookies • Questo sito internet utilizza la tecnologia dei cookies. Cliccando su 'Personalizza/Customize' accedi alla personalizzazione e alla informativa completa sul nostro utilizzo dei cookies. Cliccando su 'Rifiuta/Reject' acconsenti al solo utilizzo dei cookies tecnici. Cliccando su 'Accetta/Accept' acconsenti all'utilizzo dei cookies sia tecnici che di profilazione (se presenti).

ENG - Cookies policy • This website uses cookies technology. By clicking on 'Personalizza/Customize' you access the personalization and complete information on our use of cookies. By clicking on 'Rifiuta/Reject' you only consent to the use of technical cookies. By clicking on 'Accetta/Accept' you consent to the use of both technical cookies and profiling (if any).

Accetta
Accept
Rifiuta
Reject
Personalizza
Customize
Link
https://www.manunzio.it/diary-d
copy copied!

Share
/ / email


Counter
582.901

Terms
cookie, privacy and copyright

Powered
myphotoportal.com

Chiudi
Close
loading